nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 16:00:14 -0700
On 9/12/21 1:08 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
If vendors actually cared they could make the CGNAT's and other hacks ridiculously buggy and really expensive to deploy and maintain. I doubt many vendors were chomping at the bit to support CGNAT and are probably wondering what fresh hell is next to keep ipv4 limping along.If the mid size eyeballs knew ipv4 is going away in 10, 15, 20 years whichever it is, then they'd of course have to start moving too, because no upstream.And they would fight it tooth and nail, just like they do nowyou speak as if it was religion or they are bad people. neither is the case. it is what they see as their best business interest. being from the pacific northwest, i have learned not to try to push water uphill. so, until we can tilt the hill, it's probably bast for one's health if one gets over it.
Mike
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Denys Fedoryshchenko (Sep 22)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Tim Howe (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Tim Howe (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Fred Baker (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Johnson (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Nick Hilliard (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 13)
- RE: IPv6 woes - RFC Tony Wicks (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Joe Maimon (Sep 13)