nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:33:31 +0900
John Curran wrote:
If by "design choices" you mean the tradeoffs accepted in selecting a particular candidate protocol and declaring victory, then I’d strongly disagree.
What actually happened is that SIP was chosen but modified by IPng directorates to pretend, for political purposes, IPng were a merger of all the proposals only to make the result totally unusable, during which address length was extended from 8B to 16B to accommodate so infamous XNS style auto configuration. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jared Mauch (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Eliot Lear (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Curran (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jeroen Massar via NANOG (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Eliot Lear (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Curran (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Eliot Lear (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Curran (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Curran (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 14)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Carsten Bormann (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bill Woodcock (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine (Sep 08)