nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rack rails on network equipment
From: Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:15:42 -0500
Once upon a time, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> said:
I care, but it bothers me less that the inconsiderate air flow implemented in quite a bit of network gear. Side cooling? Pulling air from the side you know will be facing the hot aisle? Seriously, the physical build of network equipment is not entirely competent.
Which - why do I have to order different part numbers for back to front airflow? It's just a fan, can't it be made reversible? Seems like that would be cheaper than stocking alternate part numbers. -- Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net>
Current thread:
- Rack rails on network equipment Andrey Khomyakov (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Mel Beckman (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Alain Hebert (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Brandon Butterworth (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Jay Hennigan (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Denis Fondras (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Martin Hannigan (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment William Herrin (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Chris Adams (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Niels Bakker (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment William Herrin (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Chris Adams (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Bryan Fields (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Chris Adams (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Sabri Berisha (Sep 25)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Randy Carpenter (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Lady Benjamin Cannon (Sep 26)