nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rack rails on network equipment
From: Sabri Berisha <sabri () cluecentral net>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 04:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
----- On Sep 24, 2021, at 11:19 AM, William Herrin bill () herrin us wrote: Hi,
Seriously, the physical build of network equipment is not entirely competent.
Except, sometimes there is little choice. Look at 400G QSFP-DD for example. Those optics can generate up to 20 watts of heat that needs to be dissipated. For 800G that can go up to 25 watts. That makes back-to-front cooling, as some people demand, very challenging, if not impossible. Thanks, Sabri
Current thread:
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment, (continued)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Jay Hennigan (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Denis Fondras (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Martin Hannigan (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment William Herrin (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Chris Adams (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Niels Bakker (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment William Herrin (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Chris Adams (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Bryan Fields (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Chris Adams (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Jay Hennigan (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Sabri Berisha (Sep 25)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Randy Carpenter (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Lady Benjamin Cannon (Sep 26)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Joe Greco (Sep 24)