nanog mailing list archives
Re: uPRF strict more
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 07:01:39 +0200
On 9/29/21 20:14, Phil Bedard wrote:
Disclosure I work for Cisco and try to look after some of their peering guidelines.Agree with Adam’s statement, use uRPF on edge DIA customers. Using it elsewhere on the network eventually is going to cause some issue and its usefulness today is almost nil. That being said we still see large providers who have it turned on for peering/transit interfaces either out of legacy configuration or other reasons. The vast majority do not use it for those interface roles.
If you don't plan to run a full BGP table on a device, don't enable uRPF, even loose-mode.
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: uPRF strict more, (continued)
- Re: uPRF strict more Phil Bedard (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more brad dreisbach (Sep 29)
- RE: uPRF strict more Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more brad dreisbach (Sep 29)
- RE: uPRF strict more Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Message not available
- RE: uPRF strict more Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more Anoop Ghanwani (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more Baldur Norddahl (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more brad dreisbach (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Sep 29)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Hunter Fuller via NANOG (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Valdis Klētnieks (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Andrew Smith (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Sabri Berisha (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Saku Ytti (Sep 30)
- RE: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Brian Turnbow via NANOG (Sep 30)
- Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Sep 29)