nanog mailing list archives
Re: cogent and henet not peering
From: VOLKAN KIRIK <volkirik () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 18:32:00 +0300
the more uploading side pays each month for the excess amount. as content networks are supposed to pay expenses. what do you think? 19.08.2022 18:28 tarihinde Mike Hammett yazdı:
The problem them becomes *who* pays? When do the tables turn as to who pays?The alpha gets paid and the beta does the paying? The network with more POPs gets paid? The network with more downstream ASes gets paid? Is it the same for IPv4 as it is for IPv6? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp><https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From: *"VOLKAN KIRIK" <volkirik () gmail com> *To: *"Rubens Kuhl" <rubensk () gmail com> *Cc: *nanog () nanog org, dschaeffer () cogentco com, peering () cogentco com *Sent: *Friday, August 19, 2022 10:22:00 AM *Subject: *Re: cogent and henet not peering this is 50/50 situation. nobody has to peer for free. but everyone can.lets just say above 1:1 ratio he.net pays their own ip transit price to cogent for paid peering excess amount and both sides monitor trafficwe can solve this issue by becoming middlemen worldwide... both operators are cheap and they could all compete in quality.level3 pays comcast reasonable (cheap) price (under NDA maybe?). why wouldnt mleber?but to make it fair, as he.net becomes ww tier-1 operator day-by-day, lets just limit pricing to excess amount of trafficthanks for reading would appreciate your support 19.08.2022 18:09 tarihinde Rubens Kuhl yazdı: OTOH, knowing that Cogent loves splitting the global Internet is one good reason to not contract their services. I think they sell traffic to their private Intranet. Which is huge, but doesn't encompass the whole Internet. Rubens On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 12:04 PM VOLKAN KIRIK<volkirik () gmail com> wrote: lets just say cogent gives 400GE in each pop they have in common with he.net for free. BUT they will rate-limit he.net links to previous month's 95th percentile upload or download (which is minimum) rate (each month) to make ratio 1:1... to make downstream and upstream traffics fair... okay? fine? come on people, segmentation is bad.
Current thread:
- cogent and henet not peering VOLKAN KIRIK (Aug 19)
- Re: cogent and henet not peering VOLKAN KIRIK (Aug 19)
- Re: cogent and henet not peering Rubens Kuhl (Aug 19)
- Re: cogent and henet not peering VOLKAN KIRIK (Aug 19)
- Re: cogent and henet not peering Mike Hammett (Aug 19)
- Re: cogent and henet not peering VOLKAN KIRIK (Aug 19)
- Re: cogent and henet not peering VOLKAN KIRIK (Aug 19)
- Re: cogent and henet not peering Forrest Christian (List Account) (Aug 20)
- Re: cogent and henet not peering VOLKAN KIRIK (Aug 20)
- Re: cogent and henet not peering Peter Potvin via NANOG (Aug 20)
- Message not available
- Re: cogent and henet not peering VOLKAN KIRIK (Aug 20)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: (off list) Re: cogent and henet not peering VOLKAN KIRIK (Aug 20)
- Re: (off list) Re: cogent and henet not peering Mike Lyon (Aug 20)
- Re: (off list) Re: cogent and henet not peering VOLKAN KIRIK (Aug 20)
- Re: cogent and henet not peering VOLKAN KIRIK (Aug 19)