nanog mailing list archives
Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 19:20:55 +0200
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 17:20, Colton Conor <colton.conor () gmail com> wrote:
My understanding is that because it's using IPv6 in the dataplane, not all devices have to have SRv6 enabled. The in-between core devices just have to support IPv6, but not necessarily support SRv6. This is much different than traditional MPLS networks today where all devices have to support MPLS/LDP correct?
And you have this use-case? And you can't use MPLSoUDP? SRv6 is pure snake oil, an easy marketing story to people with limited knowledge. 'It is just IP bro, you already know it'. I'd like to to continue 'like already widely used X', but I don't dare, considering it's so established despite its obvious benefits only existing in marketability. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Colton Conor (Jan 11)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Vincent Bernat (Jan 11)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Saku Ytti (Jan 11)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Mark Tinka (Jan 11)
- RE: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Adam Thompson (Jan 11)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Mark Tinka (Jan 11)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Saku Ytti (Jan 12)
- RE: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices aaron1 (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Saku Ytti (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Sander Steffann (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Dale W. Carder (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Randy Bush (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Sander Steffann (Jan 12)