nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCC vs FAA Story
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 15:18:36 -0500 (CDT)
It's nice to see the FCC take regulating receivers seriously, finally. It's a two way street and we've only been looking one direction the whole time. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Crist Clark" <cjc+nanog () pumpky net> To: "nanog () nanog org list" <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2022 12:18:20 AM Subject: FCC vs FAA Story There was a lively thread on NANOG about the FCC and FAA conflict over G5 spectrum and altimeters when it all came to a head early this year. ProPublica published an investigative report on it last week, https://www.propublica.org/article/fcc-faa-5g-planes-trump-biden Whaddya know. Plenty of blame to go around. Government regulative bodies captured by the industries they’re supposed to regulate. The usual stuff.
Current thread:
- Re: FCC vs FAA Story, (continued)
- Re: FCC vs FAA Story sronan (Jun 05)
- Re: FCC vs FAA Story Doug Royer (Jun 05)
- Re: FCC vs FAA Story sronan (Jun 05)
- Re: FCC vs FAA Story Sabri Berisha (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC vs FAA Story John R. Levine (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC vs FAA Story Stephen Sprunk (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC vs FAA Story Scott McGrath (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC vs FAA Story Sabri Berisha (Jun 07)
- Re: FCC vs FAA Story Scott McGrath (Jun 07)
- Re: FCC vs FAA Story Joel Jaeggli (Jun 06)