nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 06:56:10 +0200
On 11/20/22 19:02, Abraham Y. Chen wrote:
Dear Mark: 0) I am surprised at your apparently sarcastic opinion.1) The EzIP proposal as referenced by my last MSG is the result of an in-depth system engineering effort. Since the resultant schemes do not rely on any protocol development, IETF does not need be involved. Especially, its first step of disabling one line of existing networking program code empowers any party to begin deploying EzIP stealthily for mitigating the IPv4 address pool depletion issues. Note that EzIP is a generic solution applicable to everyone, not limited to Africa.2) Of course, constructive criticism is always appreciated. However, unspecific comments that confuse and distract the readers only provide dis-service to those disadvantaged population who are enduring the handicaps of being the late-comers to the Internet.
My comment was not directed at you. Sorry.I have nothing against the EzIP proposal. It just does not add any real value in solving the IPv4 depletion problem for the amount of effort required to implement it, in my view. I'd, rather, expend those resources on IPv6, 464XLAT, e.t.c.
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: ipv4/25s and above, (continued)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Mark Tinka (Nov 17)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Joe Maimon (Nov 17)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Mark Tinka (Nov 17)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Joe Maimon (Nov 18)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 18)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Mark Tinka (Nov 19)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 20)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC Rubens Kuhl (Nov 20)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201503.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 20)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC Mark Tinka (Nov 20)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 21)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC Tom Beecher (Nov 21)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Nov 21)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC bzs (Nov 21)
- Fwd: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC Rubens Kuhl (Nov 21)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 21)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC Fred Baker (Nov 26)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Joe Maimon (Nov 17)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC David Conrad (Nov 21)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC Joe Maimon (Nov 21)
- Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Jay Hennigan (Nov 21)
- Re: ipv4/25s and above Mark Tinka (Nov 17)