nanog mailing list archives
Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported)
From: bzs () theworld com
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:33:13 -0500
On January 12, 2023 at 02:11 noah () neo co tz (Noah) wrote:
Hi John, So, It was assumed that IPv4 depletion would effectively lead to the adoption of IPv6. This has not been the case in the last decade save for a very few countries in the world. It was also assumed that IPv6 only networks would crop all over the place as a result, providing the same interconnectivity benefits enjoyed by the IPv4 internet. Out of curiosity,did the emergency of transfer markets slow IPNG adoption while creating prolonged dependence on IPv4?
Probably ten people have said this already but it was more likely due to the success of CGNAT. -- -Barry Shein Software Tool & Die | bzs () TheWorld com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
Current thread:
- Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported), (continued)
- Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) John Curran (Jan 11)
- Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Randy Bush (Jan 11)
- Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) John Curran (Jan 11)
- Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Masataka Ohta (Jan 11)
- Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Jan 11)
- Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Masataka Ohta (Jan 12)
- RE: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Jan 12)
- Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Masataka Ohta (Jan 13)
- Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Randy Bush (Jan 11)
- Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) John Curran (Jan 11)
- RE: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Jan 11)
- Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) William Herrin (Jan 12)
- Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 16)