RE: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported)

[Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

The comment looks outdated: Who cares now about ATM?
But all wireless (including WiFi) emulate broadcast in a very unsatisfactory way.
Hence, the requirement is still very accurate.

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+vasilenko.eduard=huawei.com () nanog org] On Behalf Of Masataka Ohta
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2023 7:32 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported)

Randy Bush wrote:

> three of the promises of ipng which ipv6 did not deliver
>    o compatibility/transition,
>    o security, and
>    o routing & renumbering

You miss a promise of

    o ND over ATM/NBMA

which caused IPv6 lack a notion of link broadcast.

                                                Masataka Ohta