nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Reg does 240/4
From: Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:25:03 -0800
On 2/14/24 4:23 PM, Tom Samplonius wrote:
The best option is what is happening right now: you can’t get new IPv4 addresses, so you have to either buy them, or use IPv6. The free market is solving the problem right now. Another solution isn’t needed.
Really? How many mail servers are up on IPv6? How many legacy mail clients can handle IPv6? How many MTA software packages can handle IPv6 today "right out of the box" without specific configuration?
Does any IPv6 enabled ISP provide PTR records for mail servers? How does Google handle mail from an IPv6 server? The Internet is not just the Web.
Current thread:
- Re: The Reg does 240/4, (continued)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 William Herrin (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher (Feb 13)
- Re: Enough of The Reg does 240/4 John Levine (Feb 13)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 William Herrin (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 John Levine (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Samplonius (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Stephen Satchell (Feb 14)
- Re: mail and IPv6, not The Reg does 240/4 John Levine (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Mark Andrews (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: mail and IPv6, not The Reg does 240/4 Tim Howe (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Mike Hammett (Feb 16)
- RE: The Reg does 240/4 Brotman, Alex via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 John Levine (Feb 16)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Michael Thomas (Feb 17)