nanog mailing list archives
Re: Enough of The Reg does 240/4
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 13 Feb 2024 20:51:48 -0500
It appears that Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> said:
We aren't trying to have a debate on this. All we can do is present our case, explain our reasons and hope that we can gain a consensus from the community.Respectfully, if you're just putting your case out there and hoping that people come around to your position, it's never going to happen.
I think we have once again established that repeating a bad idea over and over and over does not make it any less bad. Let's argue about something else, OK? R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: The Reg does 240/4, (continued)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Denis Fondras via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 14)
- Message not available
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Dave Taht (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Chris Adams (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 William Herrin (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher (Feb 13)
- Re: Enough of The Reg does 240/4 John Levine (Feb 13)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 William Herrin (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 John Levine (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Samplonius (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Stephen Satchell (Feb 14)
- Re: mail and IPv6, not The Reg does 240/4 John Levine (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Mark Andrews (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 15)