nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Reg does 240/4

From: Dave Taht <dave.taht () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 06:13:52 -0500

I attempted with as much nuance and humor as I could muster, to
explain and summarize the ipv4 exhaustion problem, and CGNAT, the
240/4 controversy as well as the need to continue making the IPv6
transition, on this podcast yesterday.

https://hackaday.com/2024/02/14/floss-weekly-episode-769-10-more-internet/

Enjoy.

Current thread:

Re: The Reg does 240/4, (continued)
- - - Re: The Reg does 240/4 David Conrad (Feb 13)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 13)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 David Conrad (Feb 13)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 14)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 Ryan Hamel (Feb 14)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 David Conrad (Feb 14)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 Denis Fondras via NANOG (Feb 14)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 14)
    - Message not available
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Feb 15)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 15)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 Dave Taht (Feb 15)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 Chris Adams (Feb 15)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 William Herrin (Feb 15)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Feb 16)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 14)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher (Feb 13)
    - Re: Enough of The Reg does 240/4 John Levine (Feb 13)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 14)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 William Herrin (Feb 14)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 John Levine (Feb 14)
    - Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 14)

(Thread continues...)