Re: Stealthy Overlay Network Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block

["Abraham Y. Chen via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>]

Hi, Chris:

0)    Thanks for your observation.

1)    Although I specifically requested Karim to go offline on our idea 
to his inquiry, lots of comments appeared on NANOG publicly. To be 
polite, I tried to respond by clarifying and describing each. 
Unfortunately, many comments are actually persistent IPv6 promotions, 
even my attempt of bringing up the community consensus of "Dual-Stack 
has distinguished IPv6 and IPv4 into separate tracks" was in vain.

2)    Philosophically, IPv6 and IPv4 are kind of like two religions, 
each with its own believers. As long as the devotees of each focus on 
their respective passion, the world will be peaceful. As soon as one 
camp imposes its preference onto the other, friction starts. Unchecked, 
it can go even worse. ... But, I digressed.

Regards,


Abe (2024-01-21 12:06)


On 2024-01-20 12:50, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time,sronan () ronan-online com  <sronan () ronan-online com>  said:
> > I am curious if anyone has ever given you positive feedback on this idea? So far
> > all I’ve seen is the entire community thinking it’s a bad idea. Why do you
> > insist this is a good solution?
> Because people keep responding.



--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com