Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re[2]: nmap+V
From: Bo Cato <jcato73 () comcast net>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 18:34:07 -0400
I personally would like to see a banner grab added to the list of nmap options. Actually I'd like it as a default for -sT scans privileged or unprivileged users. Coupling it with syn or other scans seems pointless. Obviously you're not going to get a banner with anything short of a full connect. Tuesday, September 02, 2003, 11:44:34 AM, you wrote: J> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- J> Hash: SHA1 J> On Tuesday 02 September 2003 10:54, Paul Johnston wrote:
Hi,Ah cool. Feature request - be able to do banner grab without doing syn scan first to see if open since if you're going to send a syn and then banner grab you might as well banner grab in the first place - from memory think this is a problem with nmap+V.The syn scan avoids the kernel's tcp implementation and does raw IP itself. After this, it's not generally possible to go back to using the kernel's tcp sockets, without starting the connection from scratch. So to support this nmap would need to contain either a full tcp implementation, or some highly platform specific hack.
J> I think you missed my point. You can simply do a connect(2) to the port in J> question and grab the banner rather than doing a SYN scan first and then a J> banner grab. J> - -jamie. J> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- J> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) J> iD8DBQE/VLrm0oWsN6bx+R0RAuYlAJwKKAIQrEFUIYPRkx6RbDc1QWF1SACfSbEE J> 0w3bDaB2i454VeG8lX+a8H4= J> =Jqep J> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- J> --------------------------------------------------------------------- J> For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to J> nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org). --------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).
Current thread:
- nmap+V testic (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap+V Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap+V Fyodor (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap+V Jamie (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap+V Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap+V Paul Johnston (Sep 02)
- Re: nmap+V Jamie (Sep 02)
- Re[2]: nmap+V Bo Cato (Sep 02)
- Re: nmap+V Jamie (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap+V Jay Freeman (saurik) (Sep 01)
- Re: nmap+V Fyodor (Sep 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: nmap+V testic (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap+V testic (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap+V Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 31)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V Max (Sep 02)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V Fyodor (Sep 02)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V Max (Sep 02)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V testic (Sep 02)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V Fyodor (Sep 06)