Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [Patch] Traceroute, Windows localhost scan fix
From: "Eddie Bell" <ejlbell () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:08:18 +0100
Hi, On 24/04/07, Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org> wrote:
regarding localhost traceroute, we may not need platform-specific code. There is probably no reason to send any packets when we know that the host is localhost.
I've coding something cleaner. It just ignores any local hosts and does not print a trace. This is the same thing that happens if directlyConnected() is true. Is this better or should we print something? thanks - eddie
Attachment:
traceroute-lhf.patch.gz
Description:
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- [Patch] Traceroute, Windows localhost scan fix Eddie Bell (Apr 20)
- Re: [Patch] Traceroute, Windows localhost scan fix Kris Katterjohn (Apr 20)
- Re: [Patch] Traceroute, Windows localhost scan fix Eddie Bell (Apr 20)
- Re: [Patch] Traceroute, Windows localhost scan fix Eddie Bell (Apr 20)
- Re: [Patch] Traceroute, Windows localhost scan fix Kris Katterjohn (Apr 20)
- Re: [Patch] Traceroute, Windows localhost scan fix Eddie Bell (Apr 21)
- Re: [Patch] Traceroute, Windows localhost scan fix Eddie Bell (Apr 20)
- Re: [Patch] Traceroute, Windows localhost scan fix Kris Katterjohn (Apr 20)
- Re: [Patch] Traceroute, Windows localhost scan fix Kris Katterjohn (Apr 20)
- Re: [Patch] Traceroute, Windows localhost scan fix Eddie Bell (Apr 25)
- Re: [Patch] Traceroute, Windows localhost scan fix Fyodor (Apr 25)