Re: Exp Branch for OpenSSL on Windows

[Brandon Enright <bmenrigh () ucsd edu>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 19 May 2008 20:15:45 -0500 or thereabouts Kris Katterjohn
<katterjohn () gmail com> wrote:
...snip...
> > I rebuilt nmap with openssl, but it didn't have any appreciable
> > effect and I note that in the minute that it took to successfully
> > complete version detection, one of my dual cores was at full-pelt
> > for around 45 seconds.  I'll look into this more deeply, but I
> > wonder if anyone else noticed similar?
>
> I haven't noticed anything like this happening, but I'll try against
> some more hosts.  Have you been able to look into it any more?

For whatever it's worth, I've been scanning millions of hosts the last
few days with -sV on SSL ports like 443, 993, 995, etc.  My scans are
not being limited by my bandwidth but my CPU.

SSL is a very CPU intensive task, especially at the initial RSA parts.
I don't think there is a bug here, I think people just don't realize
how expensive quality public-key crypto is.

Brandon

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkgya9wACgkQqaGPzAsl94K1ggCeK2AShYhPp8JlVdAavX2SdjZG
RPUAnRQOMLkODrTh1By7BRjAbQPa9TDZ
=6OVk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org