Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Buffering problems in ssh2.lua
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:05:31 -0600
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 08:34:22PM -0300, Joao Correa wrote:
Here follows a second patch, where I've implemented a function to read the packet accordingly to what David suggested. The following patch have been tested on the same conditions of the previous one, finding valid results with fragmented packets or not.
Nice job. This works for me. Using receive_buf is a clever approach I didn't think of. You're right, receiving part of the next packet is something that probably can't happen with ssh-hostkey. But it might happen with scripts that do other things in the future. Does ssh1.lua have the same problem, and can it be fixed in the same way? David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Buffering problems in ssh2.lua David Fifield (Jun 12)
- Re: Buffering problems in ssh2.lua Fyodor (Jun 13)
- Re: Buffering problems in ssh2.lua Joao Correa (Jun 14)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Buffering problems in ssh2.lua Joao Correa (Jun 14)
- Re: Buffering problems in ssh2.lua David Fifield (Jun 15)
- Re: Buffering problems in ssh2.lua Joao Correa (Jun 15)
- Re: Buffering problems in ssh2.lua David Fifield (Jun 16)
- Re: Buffering problems in ssh2.lua Joao Correa (Jun 27)
- Re: Buffering problems in ssh2.lua Joao Correa (Jun 14)
- Re: Buffering problems in ssh2.lua Fyodor (Jun 13)