Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: http-date.nse
From: "Jörg Wölke" <lumbricus () gmx net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:00:13 +0200
Hi!
Why not use HTTPs HEAD method? It should save some bandwidth.I agree HEAD would be better in this case, but http.lua doesn't support HEAD yet.
Oh, I see. But there exists a patch: "http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2009/q1/0889.html" Except for a feature request, there wasn't any answer to that. Is something wrong with the patch (sorry, I'm new to lua), or was it just overlooked?
David Fifield
Greetings, J"o! P.S.: Sorry, Dave for not replying to the list the first time. My bad. -- Freedom, Freedom, Freedom, Oi! -- Zoidberg -- Freedom, Freedom, Freedom, Oi! -- Zoidberg GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- http-date.nse David Fifield (Jul 06)
- Re: http-date.nse Fyodor (Jul 11)
- Re: http-date.nse David Fifield (Jul 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: http-date.nse Jörg Wölke (Jul 08)
- Re: http-date.nse David Fifield (Jul 08)
- Re: http-date.nse Jörg Wölke (Jul 08)
- Re: http-date.nse Joao Correa (Jul 09)
- RE: http-date.nse Rob Nicholls (Jul 09)
- Re: http-date.nse Joao Correa (Jul 09)
- Re: http-date.nse David Fifield (Jul 08)
- Re: http-date.nse Fyodor (Jul 11)