Re: NSE Script to exploit the Windows Vista and 7 SMB 2.0 remote BSOD bug?

[Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>]

On 09/14/2009 10:20 AM, David Fifield wrote:
> Would you edit your scripts to check for both nil and false (i.e.,
> "not status")? My intention, which is not reflected in the NSEDoc, was
> that the first result could be anything that evaluates to false in a
> condition. It's sort of like the difference between
>         if (cond)
> and
>         if (cond == 1)
> in C; usually you prefer the former because 1 isn't the only "true"
> value. We could just standardize on false always, but I like nil because
> it's closer to what the standard Lua functions do.
>
> I'll update the NSEDoc.
>
> David Fifield

Sure, I can make that change.

Ron

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org