Nmap Development mailing list archives

reponse to Rob


From: mike <dmciscobgp () hotmail com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:02:03 +0000



 

Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:40:22 +0000
From: robert () robnicholls co uk
To: dmciscobgp () hotmail com
CC: nmap-dev () insecure org
Subject: Re: David/stacktrace errors

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:19:54 +0000, mike <dmciscobgp () hotmail com> wrote:
i was also wanting to know, with reguards to doing an -sV scan. i notice
this always launches the default scripts for version testing as well.

It should just launch 3 scripts, those in the "version" category 
than the "default" scripts:

http://nmap.org/book/nse-usage.html

version 
The scripts in this special category are an extension to the version
detection feature and cannot be selected explicitly. They are selected to
run only if version detection (-sV) was requested. Their output cannot be
distinguished from version detection output and they do not produce service
or host script results. Examples are skypev2-version, pptp-version, and
iax2-version.

If I perform a -sV scan with -d2, for example, I can see Nmap has ony
loaded those 3 scripts:

NSE: Loaded 3 scripts for scanning.
NSE: Loaded 'iax2-version.nse'.
NSE: Loaded 'pptp-version.nse'.
NSE: Loaded 'skypev2-version.nse'.

But I agree it might be useful to have a way to prevent the scripts from
executing, so it's limited to the "classic" version detection methods.

Rob


 

 

 

i agree. something else i will ask you now that i looked into it and thought about it. maybe others can weigh in. what 
is the difference in having the debug options on and script-tracing as well? i ran debug level 3 and then i did a 
script-trace and i saw the EXACT SAME OUTPUT. do we really need 2 options that do the same thing? i would just have the 
d(level) option and it could easily do the script-trace at level 3 or higher. again, am i reading into something that 
is not there? i notice level 2 does me perfectly. it shows line by line what actual script commands are being ran and 
doesn't hit me with NSOCK routines that really show me nothing other than "something is happening"

 

m|ke

                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Windows 7: I wanted more reliable, now it's more reliable. Wow!
http://microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/default-ga.aspx?h=myidea?ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_myidea:102009
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/


Current thread: