Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nmap SoC Ideas?
From: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:29:38 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/14/2010 06:47 AM, Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
It's already part of the Feature Creepers and Bug Wranglers description, but I'd prioritize full IPv6 support for all scan types, which AFAIR includes IPv6 raw socket portability issues. Also, it might make sense to think of clever ways to guess used IPv6 addresses within a network, since with IPv6, exhaustive scanning of networks is infeasible.
Yes, it would be great to finally have this. I have another idea which isn't totally dependent on this but would be go with it quite nicely. I don't recall it being brought up before: remove the -6 option and allow mixed IPv4 and IPv6 scanning in one session. Split host batches up between the two just like is already done for directly-connected hosts and not. Sure there is more to it than that with all of o.af() stuff going on and with target parsing, but you get the gist of it. This would be awesome. Cheers, Kris Katterjohn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJLnR0CAAoJEEQxgFs5kUfuoT8P/j8b4LnF/gTBuB0Xe5nb9U7H rOvdvCg2NfogRv5ZL5pAjxCuAO2ZU2kUcP4MOpspllaCc4VO4yMw6SXO7unSSP5C /vJyNbOaXodEN3D4w1QVAGFYuUqNs3MYH9HtwdZ2TWZG05jczjOxyqERg2kF2gR6 MwXV9UdzTsgEq6DAvreCLclpk9qdJXOzWyv1YF0bx6KGCeob+SBVDIwyV2LMB4vJ Wv85809ojBB/o9ytidcYjUHG8Lc6lzH/A7R2gJDKM0bUUzC/jrLUU6gVIGQj65u8 wPS+CtYGetWfxY/VvpNc24KyCy799jpN0jeSRW3ZqPlOn5ax7lpsQQp0Ll4ZYiT3 IJbN2CPWyn5kHj+VKklyCmLn5EjRiZe17rU4bXg8QWqLejfO3XirHysg7j2t63OV iKKy+nZJPkUmivK5bNN/fS0CAAxHIjP/w8RuwpvK2Xrx8rltJJmSHDAO5Ip5XibJ s284K78azIwvJfzqbgvxER6TqkJwr/H5TYetBwlTyJ2tH4ysv3tGpTS+U9l5GWOu Vh7NHejox2WUQI+1PYYr4BPptvogJNYi4/Fzz8mI+lks3KdKFypOWZQF5gJ5Bqic JnrhNRrp8E3jad/fvjx2dX7kZlAPbydwPmoMKEod4xVNzSK0/ktrv+MLq+nwMAVQ aXG2KmqYj0FdnhjB7m4j =cEOf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas?, (continued)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? Daniel Roethlisberger (Mar 14)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? Chip Panarchy (Mar 14)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? Ron (Mar 14)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? Interactivity/phase cancellation David Fifield (Mar 14)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? Interactivity/phase cancellation Patrick Donnelly (Mar 14)
- RE: Nmap SoC Ideas? Dario Ciccarone (dciccaro) (Mar 15)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? Fyodor (Mar 15)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? Chip Panarchy (Mar 14)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? Daniel Roethlisberger (Mar 14)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? Fyodor (Mar 21)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? (progress estimates) David Fifield (Mar 21)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? (progress estimates) Ron (Mar 21)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? Fyodor (Mar 14)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? Kris Katterjohn (Mar 15)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? Michael Pattrick (Mar 15)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? David Fifield (Mar 17)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? Henri Salo (Mar 17)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? liu xiaohui (Mar 17)
- Re: Nmap SoC Ideas? liu xiaohui (Mar 17)