Nmap Development mailing list archives
GSoC idea?
From: Rahul Golwalkar <rahulgolwalkar () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:12:42 +0530
Hello everyone, I was thinking that adding a Proxy support for nmap would enhance its use greatly, as a arge portion of users are behind proxies these days. This would also support anonymous port scanning. Can you suggest whether this will be a good GSoC proposal? I have also demonstrated how a simple TCP scan would work via a proxy. After establishing a connection with a proxy server(HTTP-to be specific), if we send the message "CONNECT (destination add.):(dest. port)" to the proxy, we get the following reply "HTTP/1.0 200 Connection established" from the proxy server in case of an open port. In the case of a closed port we don't get any reply. Thus we have scanned for a single port to be open or not. We can loop it through for all the port. This will give us the TCP connect scan(of NMAP) via proxy. I suppose that the other scans via proxy shall be similar. As a demonstration I have used netcat(nc) to check the open ports of google.com via an HTTP proxy at 10.8.20.186:807 in the following video. In the video, I check out for port number 80,443 and 441 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTIwf_eWJsY Opinions please. Thank You Rahul _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- GSoC idea? Rahul Golwalkar (Mar 19)