Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: Peter's status report - #12 of 17


From: jah <jah () zadkiel plus com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 01:33:44 +0100

On 20/07/2012 20:46, Rob Nicholls wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org [mailto:nmap-dev-
bounces () insecure org] On Behalf Of Peter O
Sent: 20 July 2012 12:21
To: jah () zadkiel plus com
Cc: nmap-dev
Subject: Re: Peter's status report - #12 of 17
Hi jah,

thanks for reporting those issues. I've committed the changes in r29280.
I just tried compiling from SVN on Windows and it failed with a load of
errors due to problems with nse_fs.cc. I've not looked into it in too much
detail, but there's presumably some problem related to the includes, or
order of the includes? I tried to make the file look more like what jah
suggested in his original email, and now it seems to compile okay on Windows
in Visual Studio. I'd appreciate if someone takes a much closer look at
this, rather than committing the attached patch myself.

Rob

I see this too and I think you're right about the includes and their new order.  Your patch works for me; I've attached 
another which also removes the unnamed enum (as Paul had done in r29280) and removes the extraneous includes (all but sys/utime.h and 
direct.h). I think you should commit it if you're happy to do so.

jah

Attachment: nse_fs.cc.patch
Description:

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/

Current thread: