Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Peter's status report - #12 of 17
From: jah <jah () zadkiel plus com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 01:33:44 +0100
On 20/07/2012 20:46, Rob Nicholls wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org [mailto:nmap-dev- bounces () insecure org] On Behalf Of Peter O Sent: 20 July 2012 12:21 To: jah () zadkiel plus com Cc: nmap-dev Subject: Re: Peter's status report - #12 of 17 Hi jah, thanks for reporting those issues. I've committed the changes in r29280.I just tried compiling from SVN on Windows and it failed with a load of errors due to problems with nse_fs.cc. I've not looked into it in too much detail, but there's presumably some problem related to the includes, or order of the includes? I tried to make the file look more like what jah suggested in his original email, and now it seems to compile okay on Windows in Visual Studio. I'd appreciate if someone takes a much closer look at this, rather than committing the attached patch myself. Rob
I see this too and I think you're right about the includes and their new order. Your patch works for me; I've attached another which also removes the unnamed enum (as Paul had done in r29280) and removes the extraneous includes (all but sys/utime.h and direct.h). I think you should commit it if you're happy to do so. jah
Attachment:
nse_fs.cc.patch
Description:
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Peter's status report - #12 of 17 Peter O (Jul 16)
- Re: Peter's status report - #12 of 17 jah (Jul 18)
- Re: Peter's status report - #12 of 17 Peter O (Jul 20)
- RE: Peter's status report - #12 of 17 Rob Nicholls (Jul 20)
- Re: Peter's status report - #12 of 17 jah (Jul 20)
- Re: Peter's status report - #12 of 17 Peter O (Jul 21)
- Re: Peter's status report - #12 of 17 Peter O (Jul 20)
- Re: Peter's status report - #12 of 17 jah (Jul 18)