Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: Peter's status report - #12 of 17


From: Peter O <perdo.olma () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 15:11:00 +0200

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 2:33 AM, jah <jah () zadkiel plus com> wrote:
On 20/07/2012 20:46, Rob Nicholls wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org [mailto:nmap-dev-
bounces () insecure org] On Behalf Of Peter O
Sent: 20 July 2012 12:21
To: jah () zadkiel plus com
Cc: nmap-dev
Subject: Re: Peter's status report - #12 of 17
Hi jah,

thanks for reporting those issues. I've committed the changes in r29280.

I just tried compiling from SVN on Windows and it failed with a load of
errors due to problems with nse_fs.cc. I've not looked into it in too much
detail, but there's presumably some problem related to the includes, or
order of the includes? I tried to make the file look more like what jah
suggested in his original email, and now it seems to compile okay on
Windows
in Visual Studio. I'd appreciate if someone takes a much closer look at
this, rather than committing the attached patch myself.

Rob


I see this too and I think you're right about the includes and their new
order.  Your patch works for me; I've attached another which also removes
the unnamed enum (as Paul had done in r29280) and removes the extraneous
includes (all but sys/utime.h and direct.h). I think you should commit it if
you're happy to do so.

Thanks for the patch jah. Committed as r29289.
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/


Current thread: