oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists
From: "S.P.Zeidler" <spz () NetBSD org>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 21:17:51 +0100
Hi, Thus wrote Solar Designer (solar () openwall com):
- If yes, would it be an idea to confine or split into lists of focus groups? (like Linux vendors, BSD vendors, all OSS source using vendors, etc?)My current proposal is: split into several sub-lists. I'd start with three: Linux vendors, *BSD vendors, security "researchers". The vendor groups would be for externally submitted reports (by non-members) and for cross-vendor discussions.
I'd suggest four, then: Linux (kernel and libc), BSD (kernel and other items shared between BSDs, but not commonly seen in Linux distributions), shared/userland (who eg doesn't have OpenSSL?), and researchers (no opinion on the latter). best regards, spz -- spz () serpens de (S.P.Zeidler) spz () NetBSD org
Current thread:
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists, (continued)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Mike O'Connor (Mar 16)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Dan Rosenberg (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Greg KH (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Mark J Cox (Mar 04)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists David Hicks (Mar 04)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Nelson Elhage (Mar 04)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Steven M. Christey (Mar 04)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists S.P.Zeidler (Mar 05)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Greg KH (Mar 05)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists S.P.Zeidler (Mar 06)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Andrea Barisani (Mar 07)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Josh Bressers (Mar 08)
- Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists R P Herrold (Mar 08)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists akuster (Mar 08)