Snort mailing list archives
RE: Professionalism
From: David Kurtz <dkurtz () pwarchitects com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 18:14:08 -0600
<one last public comment please, then I go back to lurking> I'm not really convinced that this *IS* your point when I look back at the wording of your original message. It was a trifle more condescending than this last post. Why again, does the VP even see this _single_ classification that he will supposedly judge the whole of the app on? I can not speak for the Snort team, but a lot of my friends and I feel there is more to Open Source than just the idea of "beating" M$ or other vendors. So why should we adopt the same methods that Open Source would seem (at many times) to offer an fresh alternative to? If you do truly want to help out Open Source then try to learn how to program well and contribute code. This is exactly what I am trying to do... I understand and agree on your want of professionalism & of a job properly done. But I do not think that in this particular case that it realistically fits. There are A LOT of lines of code related to making snort work, you've picked out only one. I can pick out more unprofessional lines than that from just your post. Sorry.. <sigh> I suppose I say all this because I fear that someday YOU might be the VP making these kinds of bad decisions. It just seems like your missing the forest for the trees. -Dave -----Original Message----- From: Joe Smith [mailto:shadowm4n () yahoo com] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:39 PM To: snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Professionalism Nothing quite like stirring the hornet's nest... Based on many of the responses I've received, I get the impression my point has been missed and/or I didn't state it clearly enough. <snip> _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- RE: Professionalism, (continued)
- RE: Professionalism Christopher C. Northrop (Nov 14)
- Re: Professionalism Edwin Eefting (Nov 15)
- RE: Professionalism David Kurtz (Nov 13)
- RE: Professionalism Petriz, Pablo (Nov 13)
- Re: RE: Professionalism Mark Price (Nov 13)
- Re: RE: Professionalism Martin Forest (Nov 13)
- Re: RE: Professionalism Mike Poor (Nov 14)
- RE: Professionalism Sheahan, Paul (PCLN-NW) (Nov 13)
- RE: Professionalism Erek Adams (Nov 13)
- RE: Professionalism Dragos Ruiu (Nov 13)
- RE: Professionalism Erek Adams (Nov 13)
- RE: Professionalism David Kurtz (Nov 13)
- RE: Professionalism Robert D. Hughes (Nov 13)
- RE: Professionalism Abe L. Getchell (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Ralf Hildebrandt (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Roberto Suarez Soto (Nov 14)
- snort database diagrams? Edwin Eefting (Nov 14)
- Re: snort database diagrams? Roberto Suarez Soto (Nov 14)
- Re[2]: snort database diagrams? Edwin Eefting (Nov 14)
- Re: Re[2]: snort database diagrams? Guillaume (Nov 14)
- Re: Re[2]: snort database diagrams? Roberto Suarez Soto (Nov 15)