Snort mailing list archives
Bad Priority Setting
From: "J. J. Horner" <jhorner () 2jnetworks com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:23:59 -0500
I've looked at the FAQ and in the archives back a month or so and I can't find an answer to this: I'm getting a great deal of entries in syslog reporting a lot of the snort-current rules as having a Bad Priority setting. Am I missing something in my configuration or is this somewhat normal? Thanks JJ -- J. J. Horner "H*","6a686f726e657240326a6e6574776f726b732e636f6d" *************************************************** "H*","6a6a686f726e65724062656c6c736f7574682e6e6574" Freedom is an all-or-nothing proposition: either we are completely free, or we are subjects of a tyrannical system. If we lose one freedom in a thousand, we become completely subjugated.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Bad Priority Setting J. J. Horner (Jan 08)
- Re: Bad Priority Setting Phil Wood (Jan 08)
- Red Hat or Mandrake? CGI (Jan 14)
- RE: Red Hat or Mandrake? Abe L. Getchell (Jan 14)
- Re: Red Hat or Mandrake? Steve Ochani (Jan 14)
- Re: Red Hat or Mandrake? Ralf Hildebrandt (Jan 14)
- Re: Red Hat or Mandrake? Robert van der Meulen (Jan 14)
- Re: Red Hat or Mandrake? Ralf Hildebrandt (Jan 14)
- RE: Red Hat or Mandrake? Franki (Jan 14)
- Re: Red Hat or Mandrake? Erek Adams (Jan 14)
- RE: Red Hat or Mandrake? Abe L. Getchell (Jan 14)