Snort mailing list archives
Re: FW: Administrativia: No advertising please
From: Frank Knobbe <frank () knobbe us>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 00:06:08 -0500
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 23:44, Eric Hines wrote:
Ok, I'm going to take a few moments out to jump in here because I feel a few comments need to be made regarding this. Yes, Sherri Harper did make a mistake in accidentally hitting REPLY-ALL when sending out an email to a prospect. Ladies and gentlemen, in my 13 years in the industry, I've done that myself on more than one occasion...
Yeah, exactly 6 minutes after Sherri did. When she hit reply, she took time to change the subject line. Apparently she didn't take the time to remove snort-users from the cc line. It didn't bother me seeing this once. But when you pulled the same blatant stunt 6 minutes later, that's when I sent off that email. But never mind, I'll just filter your email address so this won't happen to me again in the future. PSVBRDS, Frank PS: What's up with that BRDS anyway? Does everyone at your shop have to sign their email like that? Company standard? Never mind, don't answer that...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- FW: Administrativia: No advertising please Eric Hines (May 13)
- Re: FW: Administrativia: No advertising please Frank Knobbe (May 13)
- Re: FW: Administrativia: No advertising please Frank Knobbe (May 13)
- Re: Administrativia: No advertising please Martin Roesch (May 14)
- Re: FW: Administrativia: No advertising please James Riden (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Administrativia: No advertising please SRH-Lists (May 14)
- Re: Administrativia: No advertising please Martin Roesch (May 14)
- Re: Administrativia: No advertising please M. Jamil (May 14)
- Re: Administrativia: No advertising please Martin Roesch (May 14)
- RE: Administrativia: No advertising please Kreimendahl, Chad J (May 14)