Snort mailing list archives
Re: Reliability of signatures
From: Joel Esler <jesler () sourcefire com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:32:52 -0500
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Martin Roesch <roesch () sourcefire com>wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Jim Hranicky <jfh () ufl edu> wrote:On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:13:12 -0600 Martin Holste <mcholste () gmail com> wrote:Seems like there'd almost need to be a central place that various entities could report their findings. I know we've got rules that we rely on heavily and work very well for us, but other than mailingliststhere's no place to report our findings.Hm, you mean like a vote up/down system like StackOverflow.com? That could be really interesting. It would be very valuable to see what others are finding to be helpful.Sure, something like that - that would actually be very cool.I like that idea too. It'd make a lot of sense to integrate it into snort.org - in fact there's probably a lot of data about Snort detection performance, config options and rule quality we could put up there. Communication favors the defender...
I would think it would need to have some kind of automatic reporting method, perhaps with manual commenting? J -- Joel Esler | 706-231-1451 | http://blog.snort.org | http://blog.clamav.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these rules translate into the virtual world? http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Increase in ASN.1 alerts Joe Gedeon (Feb 02)
- Re: Increase in ASN.1 alerts Michael Scheidell (Feb 02)
- Reliability of signatures Fraser, Hugh (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Martin Holste (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Matt Olney (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Jim Hranicky (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Matt Olney (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Martin Holste (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Jim Hranicky (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Martin Roesch (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Joel Esler (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Martin Holste (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Michael Scheidell (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Joel Esler (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Michael Scheidell (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Nigel Houghton (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Martin Holste (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Nigel Houghton (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Martin Holste (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Nigel Houghton (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Joel Esler (Feb 04)
- Re: Reliability of signatures Martin Holste (Feb 04)