Snort mailing list archives

Re: Event Suppression between specific Source and Destination


From: Guido Hungerbuehler <guh () open ch>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:44:07 +0100

I only agree on parts. Because if you would like to create a pass rule 
for one specific rule and the two affected hosts, this would mean that I 
basically have to copy the rule that triggers the event and replace 
'alert' with 'pass' and adjust the source and destination.

But if the signature gets a new revision, the pass-rule does not get 
updated. And I would have to check for changes in the rules manually.

It would be a lot more intuitive to have a reference on a signature and 
just deactivate alerting by using src, dst and sid.

On 12/14/2012 04:36 PM, Joel Esler wrote:
On Dec 14, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Guido Hungerbuehler <guh () open ch
<mailto:guh () open ch>> wrote:

A pass rule would be without any effect because I run the sensor in
alert-before-pass configuration.

Is there any other possibility?


Not at this time.

Why do you run in an alert before pass configuration?  That's the point
of a pass rule.

--
*Joel Esler*
Senior Research Engineer, VRT
OpenSource Community Manager
Sourcefire

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!


Current thread: