tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number
From: Denis Ovsienko <infrastation () yandex ru>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 20:58:51 +0400
Denis> There are network protocols that have an assigned port Denis> number, and there are other that don't or are commonly used Denis> on non-assigned ports, such as HTTP on port 8080. Looking at Denis> function tcp_print() in file print-tcp.c, it is clear how the Denis> former are handled, but is there any assumed way to handle Denis> the latter? I am considering adding a ZeroMQ decoder to Denis> tcpdump, to be particular. Currently the -T option is the only resort at the IP layer and UDP layer. It could apply to TCP too, perhaps.
It looks like -T applies. I've got a working code and am producing a sample capture. The ZeroMQ decoding function is called from both tcp_print() and udp_print(), should I put it into an existing file or a new file? Which of license boilerplates then? -- Denis Ovsienko _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- verbose decoding without assigned port number Denis Ovsienko (Jan 31)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Michael Richardson (Jan 31)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Denis Ovsienko (Jan 31)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Denis Ovsienko (Feb 08)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Michael Richardson (Feb 08)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Denis Ovsienko (Feb 12)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Michael Richardson (Jan 31)