tcpdump mailing list archives

Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number


From: Michael Richardson <mcr () sandelman ca>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:54:20 -0500


"Denis" == Denis Ovsienko <infrastation () yandex ru> writes:
    >> Currently the -T option is the only resort at the IP layer and
    >> UDP layer.  It could apply to TCP too, perhaps.

    Denis> It looks like -T applies. I've got a working code and am
    Denis> producing a sample capture. The ZeroMQ decoding function is
    Denis> called from both tcp_print() and udp_print(), should I put it
    Denis> into an existing file or a new file? Which of license
    Denis> boilerplates then?

New file.
2-clause BSD please.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr () sandelman ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [ 
        
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers


Current thread: