Re: Link type proposal, IEEE 802.1Qbu Frame Preemption Protocol

[Anton Glukhov <anton.a.glukhov () gmail com>]

Yes, absolutely.

Thank you!

> On 2 Dec 2017, at 18:56, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 2017, at 4:06 AM, Anton Glukhov <anton.a.glukhov () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > You are right, “express" packet is exactly the same as “ordinary”. From my point of view it’s ok to show express 
> > traffic as part of preemption traffic, hence I’d like to see Express packets in favour of “ordinary” one. Anyway I 
> > guess If we choose specific link type for 802.1qbu & 802.1br it would be the “context” in which “ordinary” traffic 
> > is called “express” packets.
>
> OK, so we'll have LINKTYPE_ETHERNET_MPACKET/DLT_ETHERNET_MPACKET, specified as:
>
>       mPackets, as specified by IEEE 802.3br Figure 99-4, starting with the preamble and always ending with a CRC 
> field
>
> Does that make sense?

_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers