Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: solaris DoS (fwd)
From: dave () SRCE HR (Drazen Kacar)
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 15:15:45 +0200
Erik Parker wrote:
Solaris 2.6 (105181-15): not vulnerable Solaris 7 (106541-07): not vulnerable Solaris 8 beta: not vulnerableI have confirmed this DOES work on Solaris 2.6 105181-16.
Hmm. I just tried on another host with 105181-14 and it crashed. Then I installed the current recommended patch set (which has 105181-16) and it doesn't crash any more. Perhaps another patch (TCP, most likely) is relevant. Prior to patching, that host had a fairly old revision of tcp patch. -- .-. .-. Life is a sexually transmitted disease. (_ \ / _) | dave () srce hr | dave () fly srk fer hr
Current thread:
- Re: solaris DoS (fwd) Erik Parker (Oct 04)
- Re: solaris DoS (fwd) Mixter (Oct 05)
- Re: solaris DoS (fwd) Drazen Kacar (Oct 05)
- Re: solaris DoS (fwd) Erik Parker (Oct 06)
- Re: solaris DoS (fwd) Drazen Kacar (Oct 07)
- Re: solaris DoS (fwd) Arindum Mukerji (Oct 07)
- Re: solaris DoS (fwd) Erik Parker (Oct 07)
- Re: solaris DoS (fwd) Drazen Kacar (Oct 05)
- Window manager - implementation bug/feature ??? Mithun Bhattacharya (Oct 06)
- Re: Window manager - implementation bug/feature ??? Chris Wilson (Oct 07)
- Re: Window manager - implementation bug/feature ??? Erik Parker (Oct 07)
- Re: Window manager - implementation bug/feature ??? Michael Jennings (Oct 07)
- Re: Window manager - implementation bug/feature ??? Erik Parker (Oct 08)
- Re: Window manager - implementation bug/feature ??? Jim Paris (Oct 08)
- Console permissions in RH 6.X (was: Re: Window manager - impementation...) Taneli Huuskonen (Oct 09)
- Re: Console permissions in RH 6.X (was: Re: Window manager - impementation...) Seth R Arnold (Oct 09)
- Re: solaris DoS (fwd) Mixter (Oct 05)