Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
[Fwd: Administrivia #4883]
From: BlueBoar () THIEVCO COM (Blue Boar)
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:12:21 -0800
Pete Krawczyk wrote:
You might want to mention that there is a list, called the security audit list, which does this sort of thing all the time. The idea is that eventually the list will audit most of the packages that are commonly used and create a truly secure, multiply-checked distribution. The FAQ is at: http://www.linuxhelp.org/lsap.shtml (but I think it's an older version) People can subscribe with security-audit-subscribe () ferret lmh ox ac uk or get more help about the list with security-audit-help () ferret lmh ox ac uk However, I'd love to see this list tear apart some projects too.
Thanks for the info, I was unaware. Little bit different slant here, since we're looking for exploits. Also, that one is Linux-specific it looks like. So, the overlap should hopefully be small. BB
Current thread:
- Administrivia #4883 Blue Boar (Jan 13)
- Re: Administrivia #4883 Marc (Jan 13)
- Re: Administrivia #4883 Travis Siegel (Jan 13)
- [Fwd: Administrivia #4883] Blue Boar (Jan 13)
- Firewall-1 Logging *Issue* Mike Frantzen (Jan 13)
- Re: Firewall-1 Logging *Issue* Blue Boar (Jan 13)
- Re: Administrivia #4883 nascheme () ENME UCALGARY CA (Jan 14)
- Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Bennett Todd (Jan 14)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Marco Walther (Jan 14)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Bennett Todd (Jan 14)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Liviu Daia (Jan 14)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) spin0ff (Jan 16)
- ICQ >= 99* + CC Data (Was: Re: Administrivia #4883) Ken Williams (Jan 16)
- Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data Vanja Hrustic (Jan 16)
- Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Bennett Todd (Jan 14)
- Re: Administrivia #4883 Marc (Jan 13)