Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Alternative ways of IP spoofing?
From: pdoru () KAPPA RO (Doru Petrescu)
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 23:08:00 +0300
There is another problem with your scenario. A well configured router will not accept to forward a packet to a brodcast address. Why ? Imagine someone sending a fake echo request from a brodcast address to your brodcast address. Best regards, ------ Doru Petrescu KappaNet - Software Engineer E-mail: pdoru () kappa ro LINUX - the choice of the GNU generation On Tue, 9 May 2000, Max.P wrote:
Hello. Lets say i work in a subnet with IP pool from (just for example) 195.195.120.10 - 195.195.120.25, so it have 15 IP's and its broadcast would be 195.195.120.25. Now i want to hide my real IP from X host and send packets with source address of broadcast (195.195.120.25). If im not missed anything the X host will send replies to that broadcast and i will recieve them. Correct me if im wrong and this wont realy work. Thanx, Max.P --
Current thread:
- Re: CGI source being exposed using "~", (continued)
- Re: CGI source being exposed using "~" Brian McKinney (May 08)
- Re: CGI source being exposed using "~" Joe (May 09)
- Alternative ways of IP spoofing? Max.P (May 09)
- Re: Alternative ways of IP spoofing? Justin Randall (May 09)
- AIM bug or feature jeff D (May 09)
- Re: AIM bug or feature Alistair Orchard (May 09)
- Punishment Blue Boar (May 09)
- Re: AIM bug or feature Justin Lintz (May 10)
- Re: AIM bug or feature White Vampire (May 10)
- really fast data Ogrodnek, Larry (May 10)
- Re: Alternative ways of IP spoofing? Doru Petrescu (May 10)
- AIM & VPN jeff D (May 10)
- Re: AIM & VPN Jeremy Gaddis (May 10)
- Re: AIM & VPN Bluefish (May 11)
- Re: AIM & VPN Matthew S. Hallacy (May 12)
- Re: CGI source being exposed using "~" Brian McKinney (May 08)
- Norton Internet Security 2000 Jon Alabot (May 10)