Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Cons and Security Validation
From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr () WATSON ORG>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:05:12 -0500
Argus' OpenHack? On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Crispin Cowan wrote:
We're trying to pick some conventions that have strong "capture the flag" like games, to do some validation on our Immunix security technologies, similar to the Type Enforcement machine that was at DefCon last year. We're already booked to go to DefCon this year, but we're looking for another/sooner convention to go to for a warm-up. Anyone have a recomendation for a security-oriented convention where we could get some serious challenges to our security provisions? Thanks, Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. Chief Research Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc. http://wirex.com Free Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org
*-------------................................................. | Andrew R. Reiter | arr () fledge watson org | "It requires a very unusual mind | to undertake the analysis of the obvious" -- A.N. Whitehead
Current thread:
- Cons and Security Validation Crispin Cowan (Feb 06)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Andrew R. Reiter (Feb 06)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Crispin Cowan (Feb 07)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Pavel Slavin (Feb 07)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Crispin Cowan (Feb 07)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Blue Boar (Feb 06)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Greg KH (Feb 06)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Blue Boar (Feb 06)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Crispin Cowan (Feb 07)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Dan Kaminsky (Feb 07)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Matt Barringer (Feb 07)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation H D Moore (Feb 08)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Crispin Cowan (Feb 10)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Greg KH (Feb 06)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Andrew R. Reiter (Feb 06)