RE: Database Encryption -- Sql Injection

["Brass, Phil (ISS Atlanta)" <PBrass () iss net>]

I'm not a cryptographer, but I believe I read in Schneier that combining
stream ciphers haphazardly can provide weaker crypto strength than
either cipher standing alone.  Why wouldn't you use one of the standard
stream or block cipher methods?

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Bergert [mailto:dbergert () nobel-net com] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 9:13 PM
> To: 'Kevin Spett'; 'Logan F.D. Greenlee'; webappsec () securityfocus com
> Subject: RE: Database Encryption -- Sql Injection
>
>
> Any valid reason (other then performance) why I couldn't do both?
>
> For Selects:
>
> At Sql Level
>
>       Select DecryptRSA(AccountNumber) as AcctNo from 
> someTable where user = '12345'
>
> At Application Level
>
>       AcctNo = DecryptAES(RecordSet("AcctNo"))
>       
>
> For DDL -- Inserts/Updates
>
>
>       Acctno = EncryptAES(AccountNumber)
>       Insert into someTable AccountNumber Values EncryptRSA(Acctno)
>
> Comments?
>
> Regards,
> Dave Bergert
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Spett [mailto:kspett () spidynamics com] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 9:53 AM
> To: Logan F.D. Greenlee; Dave Bergert; webappsec () securityfocus com
> Subject: Re: Database Encryption -- Sql Injection
>
>
> I do agree that keeping it in the application is the best 
> choice. However, it should be noted that if the crypto is 
> being used correctly, ultimately, it doesn't matter too much. 
>  The security should rely on the secrecy of the key.  In a 
> well-implemented system, an attacker should be able to have 
> the algorithm and still not have a chance at deciphering the 
> data.  You should be using an industry standard cipher and 
> not rolling your own.
>
>
> Kevin Spett
> SPI Labs
> http://www.spidynamics.com/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Logan F.D. Greenlee" <lgreenlee () ciretose net>
> To: "Dave Bergert" <dbergert () nobel-net com>; 
> <webappsec () securityfocus com>
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 10:12 PM
> Subject: RE: Database Encryption -- Sql Injection
>
>
> Dave,
> Your best bet will be to do unencryption in the application. 
> The rationale behind this is that if your database is 
> compromised by a SQL injection attack, all of the functions, 
> sprocs, views and tables will be accessible by the attacker. 
> Thus, the decrypt function in the database can be utilized by 
> the attacker in compromising your data. If a successful 
> injection attack is executed against your database, the data 
> returned by the DB will be useless to the attacker unless 
> they also have access to the decrypt function in your 
> application. By separating the two, the attacker must 
> succesfully compromise your application and your database in 
> order to compromise your data.
>
> Logan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Bergert [mailto:dbergert () nobel-net com]
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 9:32 PM
> To: webappsec () securityfocus com
> Subject: Database Encryption -- Sql Injection
>
>
> Does any one have any comments on where best to incorporate 
> Column level encryption in a Database field?  At the Database 
> Server level (via a User Defined Function) or at the 
> Application Level. Which would be less impervious to SQL Injection?
>
> I am on a MS-SQL 2000 and IIS Platform.
>
> If I had a User Defined Function for example:
>  Select decrypt(AccountNumber, "key")  from tblTable where 
> User = 'someuser'
>
> If SQL Injection occurs:
>  Select decrypt(AccountNumber, "key")  from tblTable where 
> User = 'someuser' or 1=1
>
> In this case if SQL injection occurs the encrypted field will 
> be automatically decrypted by the UDF... Showing all accountNumbers...
>
>
> If I had the Decryption handled at the Application:
>  Select encryptedAccountNumber from tblTable where User = 'someuser'
>
> And had the application call:
>  AccountNumber = DecryptFunction (ResultSet 
> ("encryptedAccountNumber" ),
> "key")
>
>
> If SQL Injection occurs, the only way data could be seen if 
> through whatever mechanism the application displays the AccountNumber
>
> (Are these scenarios identical ?)
>
> I know that encryption is not a substitution for good input 
> sanity validation. Which method would be better to implement? 
> Thanks for comments.
>
>
> Regards,
> Dave Bergert