WebApp Sec mailing list archives
RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent
From: "Levenglick, Jeff" <JLevenglick () fhlbatl com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:25:59 -0500
"If the interpretation of the patent is true (IANAL), then using much of the discussion that has taken place on this list for services and many of the tool that are used to proove those concepts (like SPIKE, PAROS etc) over the past few years looks like they are in violation. " I see.. 1) So what you are saying is that your list is/could be illegal. (hmm you really thought that anything based on pen-testing would be legal?) 2) People should not use this list because there is a chance that they can be sued based on their opinions. As I stated, this should have been sent to a legal list. ----------------------------------------- This e-mail message is private and may contain confidential or privileged information.
Current thread:
- Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent webtester (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Martin Mačok (Jan 17)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Pete Herzog (Jan 17)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent A.D. Douma (Jan 17)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Pete Herzog (Jan 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Levenglick, Jeff (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Mark Curphey (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent dreamwvr () dreamwvr com (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Matthew Wagenknecht (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Richard M. Smith (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent cdowns (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Levenglick, Jeff (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent A.D. Douma (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Matthew Wagenknecht (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Levenglick, Jeff (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Thermos, Panayiotis A. [RA] (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent sullo (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent A.D. Douma (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent sullo (Jan 17)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Matt Kenigson (Jan 17)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent sullo (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Martin Mačok (Jan 17)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent sullo (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent pentester2189114 (Jan 20)