WebApp Sec mailing list archives
RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent
From: "Richard M. Smith" <rms () computerbytesman com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:01:28 -0500
Here's the actual patent: http://tinyurl.com/2zndg The patent was filed in March 2001. The claims section is the revalent part of the patent to read to see if anyone was doing the samething before Sanctum. Richard -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Wagenknecht [mailto:Matthew.Wagenknecht () quantum com] Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 11:10 AM To: 'Levenglick, Jeff'; webtester () hushmail com; webappsec () securityfocus com; pen-test () securityfocus com Subject: RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Wow, Jeff.. Where did that come from? I think that this request is quite legitimate. It has much more to do with pen-test and web application security than legal issues.. Truth is Sanctum's patent request is an attampt to own common sense. The methodology detailed in the patent request is not the result of an internal think tank at Sanctum that came up with a new thought process for web app penetration testing. The details basically describe the equivilent of walking up to every house on a street and rattling the dorr knobs. If the dorr doesn't open easily, try every key-like object in their possesion to jimmy the lock. It's like me trying to patent how I pay bills and not allowing anyone else to do it that way.. It's just silly..
Current thread:
- Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent webtester (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Martin Mačok (Jan 17)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Pete Herzog (Jan 17)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent A.D. Douma (Jan 17)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Pete Herzog (Jan 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Levenglick, Jeff (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Mark Curphey (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent dreamwvr () dreamwvr com (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Matthew Wagenknecht (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Richard M. Smith (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent cdowns (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Levenglick, Jeff (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent A.D. Douma (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Matthew Wagenknecht (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Levenglick, Jeff (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Thermos, Panayiotis A. [RA] (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent sullo (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent A.D. Douma (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent sullo (Jan 17)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Matt Kenigson (Jan 17)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent sullo (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Martin Mačok (Jan 17)