WebApp Sec mailing list archives
RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent
From: <pentester2189114 () hushmail com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:46:38 -0800
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:26:28 -0800 owasp () moiler com wrote:
In which case would 'prior art' relating to individual sections of the patent still be relevant?
It is possible to combine relevant prior art to invalidate a patent, but it is much more difficult. It is called obviousness, and it means that the method described in the patent would have been obvious to a person skilled in the art through the combination of multiple references. But this is intuitive and subject to debate, and the case law does not shine on this type of defense. A single piece of prior art that predates the original patent application date by one year and that specifically describes a process that mirrors all of the claims within the patent is a powerful and compelling defense. The PTO would be hard pressed to ignore such prior art. Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger https://www.hushmail.com/services.php?subloc=messenger&l=434 Promote security and make money with the Hushmail Affiliate Program: https://www.hushmail.com/about.php?subloc=affiliate&l=427
Current thread:
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent, (continued)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Thermos, Panayiotis A. [RA] (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent sullo (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent A.D. Douma (Jan 16)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent sullo (Jan 17)
- Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Matt Kenigson (Jan 17)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent sullo (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent Thermos, Panayiotis A. [RA] (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent sullo (Jan 16)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent pentester2189114 (Jan 20)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent sullo (Jan 20)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent pentester2189114 (Jan 20)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent owasp (Jan 20)
- RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent pentester2189114 (Jan 20)