Re: [WEB SECURITY] Fundamental error in Corsaire's paper?

[Dan Kuykendall <dan () kuykendall org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Amit Klein (AKsecurity) wrote:
> To turn the question back to you: GIVEN all the attacks discussed
> above and in my paper, in which realistic scenario do
> you perceive that setting the path makes the cookies more
> secure than not setting it?

I know I'm not the one you are asking, but I think setting the path is
LESS secure. Not because of any technical reason, given the fact that
its easily circumvented, but because of the false sense of security that
gets placed by developers using the path.

- --
Dan Kuykendall (aka Seek3r)
http://www.mightyseek.com

In God we trust, all others we virus scan.
Programmer - an organism that turns coffee into software.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEURh3K8FkGutbdPMRAhRpAKCPJfdqhrsdVLY+RzIIxj9x+wloawCgkbMs
c/6354DSoCwIoAnP/gAk5Fo=
=I3mQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: Watchfire

Watchfire's AppScan is the industry's first and leading web application 
security testing suite, and the only solution to provide comprehensive 
remediation tasks at every level of the application. Change the way you 
think about application security testing - See for yourself. 
Download a Free Trial of AppScan 6.0 today!

https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/appscansix.aspx?id=701300000007kaF
--------------------------------------------------------------------------