Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8
From: Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:02:02 -0400
Jeff Morriss wrote:
Bill Meier wrote:I've found at least one case wherein se_alloc'd memory is referenced after it's been freed. (I think this case just happens to work because the memory wasn't yet reassigned).I was contemplating adding an optional memory-scrubber to ensure that we're not doing that: just writing 0xdeadbeef to the ep_ and se_ alloc'd memory when we free it.
I was thinking the same thing .... My first try (just clearing memory) a day or so ago seemed to cause Wireshark to run rather slowly. I put it aside and didn't delve into why... Bug in my code ??? Clearing 10 Megs for each frame ??
Maybe I should wait 'til this is fixed.
I think it would be a useful thing to do (at least under a "debug..." env variable). I don't think my fixes at this point will involve emem.c so feel free . :) Bill ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Bill Meier (Oct 09)
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Bill Meier (Oct 10)
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Kovarththanan Rajaratnam (Oct 11)
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Kovarththanan Rajaratnam (Oct 11)
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Bill Meier (Oct 11)
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Anders Broman (Oct 12)
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Bill Meier (Oct 12)
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Bill Meier (Oct 15)
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Jeff Morriss (Oct 15)
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Bill Meier (Oct 15)
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Jeff Morriss (Oct 20)
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Bill Meier (Oct 20)
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Bill Meier (Oct 11)
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Bill Meier (Oct 19)
- Re: g_mem-chunk_destroy does not free memory for GLib > 2.8 Jaap Keuter (Oct 12)