Re: To many STP protocol

[Kelik <kelik.networks () gmail com>]

Thanks all,
I'm understand now and will continue to learn about it..

Thanks & Regards

Ian Schorr wrote:
> A common mistake is to assume that seeing lots of broadcasts traffic
> in a trace = a high rate of broadcasts.
>
> Let's say I took a trace and out of 100 packets, 50 of them were STP.
> That might seem like a lot.  50% of my traffic is STP!  But if my
> trace is 100 seconds long, that means that I'm seeing one tiny STP
> packet every 2 seconds, which would NOT be a lot.  Basically, the more
> "idle" the link you're monitoring is, the higher the RATIO of
> broadcasts to unicast traffic will tend to be.  Psychologically,
> newbies tend to interpret these as "floods" or "lots of traffic" when
> they're not even close.
>
> -Ian
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Martin Visser <martinvisser99 () gmail com> wrote:
>   
> > I presume you are saying that you are seeing too many STP packets on your
> > network. What is too many to you? I would expect to see a STP BPDU every 2
> > seconds from the switch I connect to. Depending on the STP mode you are
> > using you might see a STP BPDU on every VLAN you have configured on that
> > switch, and you would see each and every one on the 802.1q trunks connecting
> > them.
> > Regards, Martin
> >
> > MartinVisser99 () gmail com
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Kelik <kelik.networks () gmail com> wrote:
> >     
> > > Dear all,
> > > I want to know why there is so many STP protocol in my wireshark?
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards
> > >
> > > ___________________________________________________________________________
> > > Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> > > Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> > > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
> > >
> > > mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
> > >       
> > ___________________________________________________________________________
> > Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> > Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
> >             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
> >
> >     
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>              mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
>
>   
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe