Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: TCP Previous segment lost, TCP dup ACK
From: Martin Visser <martinvisser99 () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:27:20 +1000
I'd pretty certain that this 10.33.22.90 hoping to invoke Fast Retransmit - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_retransmit Regards, Martin MartinVisser99 () gmail com On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Thomas Ellingsén < Thomas.Ellingsen () crosskey se> wrote:
Hi, I get TCP Previous segment lost folowed by 2-10 TCP Dup ACK 3381 2010-04-19 12:33:55.284770 192.176.3.132 10.32.22.90 TCP [TCP Previous segment lost] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 3382 2010-04-19 12:33:55.286392 10.32.22.90 192.176.3.132 TCP [TCP Dup ACK 3379#1] 56791 > 29900 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=269280 Win=254 Len=0 SLE=270296 SRE=270660 3384 2010-04-19 12:33:55.333856 10.32.22.90 192.176.3.132 TCP [TCP Dup ACK 3379#2] 56791 > 29900 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=269280 Win=254 Len=0 SLE=270296 SRE=270723 3387 2010-04-19 12:33:55.478371 10.32.22.90 192.176.3.132 TCP [TCP Dup ACK 3379#3] 56791 > 29900 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=269280 Win=254 Len=0 SLE=270296 SRE=270791 ... From what I understand there is lost packets. Is there any way to see in what direction the packets are getting dropped/lost? Why is 10.32.22.90 sending the same ACK multiple times? Is "he" waiting for a response on the ACK?? It does not make sence to me. Regrads, Thomas ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- TCP Previous segment lost, TCP dup ACK Thomas Ellingsén (Apr 19)
- Re: TCP Previous segment lost, TCP dup ACK Martin Visser (Apr 19)
- Re: TCP Previous segment lost, TCP dup ACK Thomas Ellingsén (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP Previous segment lost, TCP dup ACK Martin Visser (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP Previous segment lost, TCP dup ACK Thomas Ellingsén (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP Previous segment lost, TCP dup ACK Martin Visser (Apr 19)