Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Any Replacement function for proto_tree_add_boolean_hidden
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:32:03 -0400
Reddy Nagendra-GKTC37 wrote:
Hi Experts, In 1.0.2 there is one function called 'proto_tree_add_boolean_hidden'. Is there any similar function 1.2.6 ?
This question is probably better aimed at the -dev list. The _hidden APIs were all deprecated, largely because it's not a good idea to have hidden fields from a UI perspective (if they're hidden, how does the user know they're there?). But you can still add hidden items by doing, for example: item = proto_tree_add_boolean() PROTO_ITEM_SET_HIDDEN(item) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Any Replacement function for proto_tree_add_boolean_hidden Reddy Nagendra-GKTC37 (Apr 19)
- Re: Any Replacement function for proto_tree_add_boolean_hidden Jeff Morriss (Apr 19)
- Re: Any Replacement functionfor proto_tree_add_boolean_hidden Reddy Nagendra-GKTC37 (Apr 19)
- Re: Any Replacement function for proto_tree_add_boolean_hidden Jeff Morriss (Apr 19)