Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Dissecting a Protocol with multiple static TCP ports
From: Craig Bumpstead <cbumpste () yahoo com au>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
Chris, So your saying to reassemble the packet then run the dissector again? Is there a way that I can just specify the TCP Port range with just 2 port numbers? Regards, Craig ----- Original Message ---- From: "Maynard, Chris" <Christopher.Maynard () GTECH COM> To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Sent: Tue, 27 April, 2010 12:02:02 PM Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissecting a Protocol with multiple static TCP ports Craig, You probably need to take a look at tcp_dissect_pdus(). If you're lucky, it'll help you reassemble your TCP stream; if not, you might need to write your own TCP reassembly routines. There are many dissectors that make use of it for reassembly and it's documented in section 2.7.1 of README.developer, so hopefully you find plenty of help and examples about it. Assuming that's what you need of course. - Chris ________________________________________ From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Craig Bumpstead [cbumpste () yahoo com au] Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:38 PM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissecting a Protocol with multiple static TCP ports Bill, The packets that are not decoded are decoded as TCP packets. So I don't understand why it only decodes the first one. I must be making a mistake in the code. Regards, Craig ----- Original Message ---- From: Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com> To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Sent: Tue, 27 April, 2010 11:10:14 AM Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissecting a Protocol with multiple static TCP ports Craig Bumpstead wrote:
Bill, Thanks for the quick response. That setting is off. The first and second packets are TCP port 4435 and 21016 which it decodes. However from that point on it doesn't decode packets with TCP port 4435. I loath posting my code, but obviously I am making a mistake somewhere.
I don't see anything obviously wrong with the code. A question: What is actually shown in Wireshark for the packets not decoded ? Are they decoded as TCP ? As some other protocol ? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this email in error, please delete it from your system immediately and notify us either by email, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward, or otherwise disclose the content of the email. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Dissecting a Protocol with multiple static TCP ports Craig Bumpstead (Apr 26)
- Re: Dissecting a Protocol with multiple static TCP ports Bill Meier (Apr 26)
- Re: Dissecting a Protocol with multiple static TCP ports Craig Bumpstead (Apr 26)
- Re: Dissecting a Protocol with multiple static TCP ports Bill Meier (Apr 26)
- Re: Dissecting a Protocol with multiple static TCP ports Craig Bumpstead (Apr 26)
- Re: Dissecting a Protocol with multiple static TCP ports Maynard, Chris (Apr 26)
- Re: Dissecting a Protocol with multiple static TCP ports Craig Bumpstead (Apr 26)
- Re: Dissecting a Protocol with multiple static TCP ports Stephen Fisher (Apr 27)
- Re: Dissecting a Protocol with multiple static TCP ports Craig Bumpstead (Apr 26)
- Re: Dissecting a Protocol with multiple static TCP ports Bill Meier (Apr 26)