Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 35213: /trunk/docbook/wsdg_src/ /trunk/docbook/wsdg_src/: WSDG_chapter_build_intro.xml WSDG_preface.xml

[Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>]

On 12/18/2010 06:13 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:53:09PM -0500, Bill Meier wrote:
> > It seemed like a good idea to me.  I find trying to read
> > README.developer rather tedious, altho I do agree that a plain text file
> > can be grep'ed and etc.
> >
> > If there's feeling that README.developer should be left as is, then I
> > can certainly revert the changes.
>
> If someone is willing and able to create a readable ascii version from the
> docbook (as proposed in another mail to this thread), then docbook
> integration would be my preferred solution as it provides one source where
> to search for programming information. Right now I use wsdg rarely because
> of its format.

+1.

I never use the wsdg.  I used it once or twice for the 
how-to-set-up-a-win32-build instructions and I looked at it a couple of 
times after that when reviewing patches against it.

I use README.developer on a fairly regular basis.

:e doc/R<tab>dev<tab><enter>/whatever-I'm-looking-for

(optionally followed by a bunch of "n"s) gets me what I want pretty 
quickly.  I can even then cut-n-paste a sample function call (for 
example) into whatever file I'm editing, all without touching the mouse.

I wouldn't mind too much if the text-only version was generated, though 
it might make it slightly less likely that I'd edit it.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe